INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMPENSATION INSURANCE ACT [See entire ACT]

CHAPTER Ⅵ Request for Examination and Re-examination

Article 103 (Request for Examination)

(1) A person who is dissatisfied with decisions, etc., (hereinafter referred to as “decisions, etc., on insurance benefits etc.”) by the Corporation, falling under any of the following subparagraphs, may make a request for examination to the Corporation:[Amended by Act No. 10305, May 20, 2010]
1. Decisions on the insurance benefits under Chapter III and Chapter III-2;
2. Decisions on the medical expenses under Article 45 and Article 91-6 (4);
3. Decisions on the medicine expenses under Article 46;
4. Measures, etc., to change a medical treatment plan under Article 47 (2);
5. Decisions on the lump-sum payment of insurance benefits under Article 76;
5-2. Measures concerning prevention and control of complications, etc. under Article 77;
6. Decisions on the collection of undue gains under Article 84;
7. Decisions on the subrogation of the right to receive benefits under Article 89
(2) The request for examination as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be made to the Corporation through an organization under the control of the Corporation, which has made the decision, etc., on the insurance benefits concerned.
(3) The request for examination as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be made within 90 days after the decision on insurance benefits is informed.
(4) An organization under the control of the Corporation shall, upon receiving a request for examination pursuant to paragraph (2), send it to the Corporation together with its written opinion within five days.
(5) No administrative appeal as prescribed by the Administrative Appeals Act shall be made against a decision, etc., on insurance benefits.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 96 (Methods of Requests for Examination)

(1) A request for examination under Article 103 of the Act shall be filed in a document specifying the following (hereinafter referred to as "written request for examination"):

1. Name and address of the requester (if such requester is a corporation, the name and location of such corporation and the name of its representative);

2. Details of a decision on insurance benefits under the subparagraphs of Article 103 (1) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as "decision on insurance benefits, etc."), which is subject to the request for examination;

3. Date on which the requester attains the knowledge of the decision on insurance benefits, etc.;

4. Purport of and grounds for the request for examination;

5. Whether the request for examination is notified, and the contents of the notification.

(2) If the person filing a request for examination is not the employee suffering from an accident (excluding requests for examination under Article 103 (1) 2 and 3 of the Act), the following shall be specified in the written request for examination in addition to those referred to in the subparagraphs of paragraph (1):

1. Name of the employee suffering from the accident;

2. Name and location of the business to which the employee belonged at the time of the accident.

(3) If the request for examination is filed by an appointed representative or agent, the name and address of the appointed representative or agent shall be specified in the written request for examination in addition to those referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2).

(4) A written request for examination shall be signed or sealed by the person filing the request for examination or his/her agent.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 97 (Correction and Rejection)

(1) If a request for examination is made after the expiration of the period prescribed in Article 103 (3) of the Act or violates the formalities as prescribed by the Act and its subordinate statutes to the point of being unable to be corrected, or fails to be corrected within the period as referred to in paragraph (2), the Corporation shall decide to reject it.
(2) Even though a request for examination may violates the legal formalities, if it is possible to correct such violation, the Corporation may demand the person making the request for examination to correct it within a set period of time:Provided that if the matters to be corrected are insignificant, the Corporation may make that correction by virtue of its authority.
(3) If the Corporation corrects a request for examination by virtue of its authority pursuant to the proviso of paragraph (2), it shall notify the requesting person of this.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 98 (Suspension of Execution of Decision on Insurance Benefits)

(1) A request for examination shall not suspend the execution of a decision on the insurance benefits concerned:Provided that if it is deemed that there is an urgent necessity to avoid grave losses to be caused by the execution, the Corporation may suspend the execution.
(2) The Corporation shall, upon suspending the execution under the proviso of paragraph (1), notify this without delay using a document to the person making the request for examination and the affiliate organization of the Corporation which has made the decision about the insurance benefits concerned.
(3) The document referred to in paragraph (2) shall include the following matters:
1. Title of the case involving the request for examination;
2. Decision, etc., on the insurance benefits subject to the suspension of execution, and the details of the suspension of execution;
3. Name and address of the person making the request for examination;and
4. Reasons for the suspension of execution

Article 104 (Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Examination Committee)

(1) In order to deliberate on a request for examination made pursuant to Article 103, the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Examination Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “Examination Committee”) composed of relevant experts shall be set up in the Corporation.
(2) The provision of Article 108 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the exclusion, challenge and refrainment of a member of the Examination Committee.
(3) Necessary matters concerning the composition and operation of the Examination Committee shall be prescribed by the Presidential Decree.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 99 (Composition of Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Examination Committee)

(1) The Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Examination Committee (hereinafter referred to as “the Examination Committee”) referred to in Article 104 (1) of the Act shall be composed of less than 90 members, including one chairperson, of which two shall be permanent members.
(2) The members of the Examination Committee shall be commissioned or appointed by the president of the Corporation from among persons falling under any of the following subparagraphs:
1. Judges, public prosecutors, defence lawyers or certified public labor affairs consultants with 5 years or more of experience;
2. Those who are serving or served as an associate professor or higher at a college prescribed in Article 2 of the Higher Education Act;
3. Those who have been engaged in labor-related services or industrial accident compensation insurance-related services for 10 year or more;and
4. Those with plenty of knowledge and experience in social insurance or industrial medical science
(3) The chairperson of the Examination Committee shall be appointed by the president of the Corporation from among the permanent members.
(4) Two fifths of the members of the Examination Committee shall be commissioned from among persons falling under any subparagraph of paragraph (2) and recommended by workers’ and employers’ organizations, respectively. In this case, equal numbers of members shall be recommended by workers’ and employers’ organizations.
(5) The term of office of a member of the Examination Committee shall be three years and renewable:Provided that a member whose term has expired may perform the duties until his/her successor is appointed.
(6) Except as provided in this Decree, matters necessary for the organization of the Examination Committee shall be determined by the Corporation.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 100 (Operation of Examination Committee)

(1) The chairperson of the Examination Committee shall convene and chair meetings of the Examination Committee:Provided, That if it is necessary for the efficient operation of the Examination Committee, the chairperson may order a standing member or any other member designated by the chairperson to preside over a meeting of the Examination Committee.
(2) A meeting of the Examination Committee shall consist of the chairperson (where a standing member or a member designated by the chairperson presides over the meeting pursuant to the proviso to paragraph (1), this refers to that member) and six members designated by the chairperson for each meeting.
(3) A meeting of the Examination Committee shall be opened with attendance of a majority of the members referred to in paragraph (2) and a decision shall be taken with approval of a majority of the members present.
(4) If the Corporation makes a decision that has to undergo deliberation by the Examination Committee, in regard of a request for examination, it shall draw up a protocol of review as regards progress in the deliberation.
(5) With regard to the preparation, inspection, etc., of the protocol of review under paragraph (4), the provision of Article 110 shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, “Reexamination Committee” shall be read as “Examination Committee” and “request for reexamination” as “request for examination”.
(6) Members, other than the permanent members and those working as an officer or employee of the Corporation, who are present at a meeting of the Examination Committee, may be paid allowances and travel expenses within the limits of the budget.
(7) Except as provided in this Decree, matters necessary for the operation of the Examination Committee shall be determined by the Corporation.

Article 105 (Deliberation and Decisions on Requests for Examination)

(1) The Service shall make a decision on any request for examination filed after deliberation by the Examination Committee within 60 days after it receives a written request for examination under Article 103 (4): Provided, That where it is impossible to make a decision thereon within such period due to unavoidable reasons, such period may be extended only once within the limit of 20 days.

(2) Notwithstanding the main clause of paragraph (1), if there is any ground prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as a request for examination filed after the period of the request for examination ends, a decision on the request for examination may be rendered without a deliberation process by the Examination Committee.

(3) When the period of the decision is extended pursuant to the proviso of paragraph (1), the requester for examination and the agency affiliated with the Service which has rendered the decision on insurance benefits, etc. shall be informed thereof until seven days before the period of the initial decision ends.

(4) If it is required for deliberating on a request for examination, the Service may, upon request by the requester or ex officio, take the following measures:

1. To have the requester or other interested person appear at a designated place, in order to ask questions or to seek his or her opinion;

2. To have the requester or other interested person present any documents or other things that can be used as evidence;

3. To have a third person having expertise or experience make an appraisal;

4. To have an employee belonging to the Service enter any place of business or other place related to the case, in order to ask questions to the business owner, employees and other interested persons or to inspect documents or other things;

5. To have an employee related to the request for examination diagnosed by a doctor, dentist or oriental medical doctor (hereinafter referred to as "doctor, etc.") designated by the Service.

(5) Any employee belonging to the Service who makes questions or inspections under paragraph (4) 4 shall carry a certificate indicating his or her authority and show it to interested persons.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 101 (Method of Decision on Request for Examination)

(1) The decision on a request for examination as prescribed in Article 105 (1) of the Act shall be made in writing.
(2) The decision as referred to in paragraph (1) shall include the following matters:
1. Number and title of the case;
2. Name and address of the person making the request for examination (name and location of the corporation and name of its representative in case the person making the request for examination is a corporation);
3. If the person making the request for examination is not the worker suffering from the accident, the name and address of the affected worker;
4. If the person filing the request for examination is not the worker suffering from an accident, the name and address of the affected worker;
5. Main text;
6. Purpose of the request for examination;
7. Reason;and
8. Date of decision
(3) When the Corporation has made a decision on a request for examination pursuant to paragraph (1), it shall send an original copy of the decision on examination to the person making the request for examination.
(4) In case where the Corporation makes a decision on insurance benefits or a request for examination, it shall inform the other party or the person making the request for examination of whether or not he/she can make a request for examination or reexamination with regard to the decision on insurance benefits or a request for examination, and of the request procedures and period, if he/she makes the request.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 102 (Exclusion from Deliberation by Examination Committee)

(1) “The reasons prescribed by the Presidential Decree” in Article 105 (2) of the Act refer to cases where the request for examination falls under any of the following subparagraphs:
1. In case where the decision on the recognition of work-related disease has been made after deliberation by the Work-related Disease Adjudication Committee under Article 38 of the Act;
2. In the case of Pneumoconiosis;
3. In the case of carbon bisulfide poisoning;
4. In case where the request for examination falls under any of the reasons for rejection referred to in Article 97 (1);
5. In case where the request for examination is filed against a decision on medical expenses or medicine expenses (including medical expenses or medicine expenses belonging to the medical care expenses referred to in the proviso of Article 40 (2) of the Act;or
6. Other cases where it is clear whether or not the decision, etc., on insurance benefits subject to the request for examination is legitimate
(2) Notwithstanding the provision of paragraph (1), if a request for examination falls under any subparagraph of paragraph (1), and the Corporation deems it necessary to make a decision after deliberation by the Examination Committee, the decision may be made after deliberation by the Examination Committee.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 103 (Investigation for Review)

(1) The investigation for review on a request for examination referred to in Article 105 (4) of the Act shall be requested using a document specifying the following matters:
1. Title of the case relevant to the request for examination;
2. Purpose of and reasons for the request;
3. Names and addresses of related persons asked to appear (limited to the case of Article 105 (4) 1 of the Act);
4. Indication of documents and other things required to be submitted, and the name and address of the owner or custodian thereof (limited to the case of Article 105 (4) 2 of the Act);
5. Matters to be appraised and reasons for the appraisal (limited to the case of Article 105 (4) 3 of the Act);
6. Names and location of the workplace and other places to enter, the names and addresses of the employer, workers and other related persons to be questioned, and the indication of the documents and other things to be inspected (limited to the case of Article 105 (4) 4 of the Act);and
7. Name and address of the worker who is to undergo a medical examination (limited to the case of Article 105 (4) 5 of the Act).
(2) If the Corporation has conducted an investigation pursuant to Article 105 (4) of the Act, it shall prepare a protocol of review specifying the following matters. In this case, if it has had the person making the request for examination or a related person make statements pursuant to Article 105 (4) 1 of the Act, it shall make a record of the statements and attach the record:
1. Number and title of the case;
2. Date, time and place of the investigation;
3. Object and method of the investigation;and
4. Result of the investigation.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 104 (Payment of Actual Expenses)

A related person who turns up at a designated place pursuant to Article 105 (4) 1 of the Act, and an appraiser who makes an appraisal pursuant to subparagraph 3 of the same paragraph shall be paid their actual expenses under the conditions as prescribed by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Employment and Labor.

Article 106 (Request for Re-examination)

(1) A person, who is dissatisfied with a decision on a request for examination made under Article 105 (1), may make a request for reexamination to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee as prescribed in Article 107:Provided that a person who is dissatisfied with a decision on insurance benefits, which has been deliberated by the Adjudication Committee, may make a request for reexamination without making a request for examination pursuant to Article 103.
(2) The request for reexamination as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be made to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee prescribed in Article 107 through an affiliate organization of the Corporation, which has made the decision, etc., on insurance benefits.
(3) The request for reexamination as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be made within ninety days after the decision on the request for examination is informed:Provided that if a request for reexamination is made without making a request for examination pursuant to the proviso of paragraph (1), the request shall be made within ninety days after the decision on insurance benefits is informed.
(4) The provisions of Article 103 (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis with regard to requests for reexamination. In this case, “written request for examination” shall be read as “written request for reexamination”, and “Corporation” as the “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee”.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 105 (Formalities of Request for Reexamination)

(1) The request for reexamination as prescribed in Article 106 of the Act shall be made using a document specifying the following matters:
1. Name and address of the person making the request for reexamination (name and location of the corporation and name of its representative in case the person making the request for reexamination is a corporation);
2. Details of the decision on insurance benefits subject to the request for reexamination;
3. Date on which the decision (decision, etc., on insurance benefits in the case of the request for reexamination referred to in the proviso of Article 106 (3) of the Act) on the request for examination is known;
4. Purpose of and reason for the request for reexamination;
5. Whether or not the request for reexamination is informed, and the details thereof;and
(2) The provisions of Article 96 (2) through (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis as regards the formalities for making a request for reexamination. In this case, “person making the request for examination” shall be read as “person making the request for reexamination”, “written request for examination” as “written request for reexamination” and “request for examination” as “request for reexamination”.

Article 107 (Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee)

(1) In order to deliberate and decide on requests for reexamination as prescribed in Article 106, there shall be established an Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee (hereinafter referred to as the "Reexamination Committee") in the Ministry of Employment and Labor.

(2) The Reexamination Committee shall be comprised of up to 90 members, including one chairperson, but two persons of such members shall be standing members; and one person of such members shall be an ex officio member.

(3) Two-fifths of the members of the Reexamination Committee shall be comprised of persons recommended by employees' organizations and employers' organizations, respectively, from among persons falling under paragraph (5) 2 through 5. In such cases, the number of persons recommended by employees' organizations shall be equal to the number of persons recommended by employers' organizations.

(4) Notwithstanding paragraph (3), where the number of persons recommended by employees' organizations or employers' organizations, respectively, is less than 1/5 of the total number of members to be commissioned, the latter part of paragraph (3) shall not apply; and the number of members recommended by employees' organizations and employers' organizations may be less than 2/5 of the total number of members.

(5) The chairperson and members of the Reexamination Committee shall be appointed by the President upon the recommendation of the Minister of Employment and Labor, from among the following persons: Provided, That the ex officio member shall be a person nominated by the Minister of Employment and Labor, from among public officials of Grade III in general service of the Ministry of Employment and Labor or from among public officials in general service of the Senior Executive Service:

1. Those who are or were in office as public officials of at least Grade III or public officials in general service of the Senior Executive Service;

2. Judges, public prosecutors, attorneys-at-law, or certified labor affairs consultants with at least 10 years of experience;

3. Those who are or were in office as associate professors or higher at schools prescribed in Article 2 of the Higher Education Act;

4. Those who have engaged in labor-related services or industrial accident compensation insurance-related services for at least 15 years;

5. Those with substantial knowledge and experience in social insurance or industrial medical science.

(6) None of the following persons shall be appointed as a member:

1. A person under adult guardianship, a person under limited guardianship, or a person declared bankrupt and not yet reinstated;

2. A person for whom three years have not passed since his or her imprisonment without labor or a heavier punishment declared by a court was completely executed or the non-execution of such sentence became final;

3. A mentally defective person or a mentally weak person.

(7) The term of office of members (excluding ex officio members) of the Reexamination Committee shall be three years but may be renewed consecutively; and the chairperson or a member whose term has expired shall continue to perform his or her duties until his or her successor is appointed.

(8) No member of the Reexamination Committee shall be dismissed from office against his or her will except in any of the following cases:

1. Where he or she is sentenced to imprisonment without labor or a heavier punishment;

2. Where he or she becomes unable to perform his or her duties due to any chronic physical or mental infirmity;

3. Where he or she commits any misconduct in relation to his or her duties or is deemed unfit to be in office as a member of the Reexamination Committee due to a misconduct.

(9) The Reexamination Committee shall establish a secretariat.

(10) Matters necessary for the organization, operation, etc. of the Reexamination Committee shall be determined by Presidential Decree.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 106 (Composition of Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee)

(1) The Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “Reexamination Committee”) prescribed in Article 107 of the Act shall have a chairperson and three deputy chairpersons or less.
(2) The deputy chairperson shall be elected by the Reexamination Committee from among the members.
(3) The chairperson shall represent the Reexamination Committee, and have general control over the affairs of the Examination Committee.
(4) The deputy chairperson shall assist the chairperson, and if the chairperson is not able to carry out his/her duties owing to unavoidable circumstances, he/she shall act for the chairperson.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 107 (Operation of Examination Committee)

(1) The chairperson shall convene and chair meetings of the Examination Committee.:Provided that the deputy chairperson may, if it is necessary for the smooth operation of the Examination Committee, preside over a meeting of the Examination Committee on the order of the chairperson.
(2) When the chairperson intends to convene a meeting of the Examination Committee, he/she shall notify in writing each member of the date, time, place and agenda of the meeting five days before the meeting is held:Provided that if a meeting has to be urgently convened, the notification may be given orally, by phone or through any other means no later than the day before the meeting is held.
(3) A meeting of the Reexamination Committee shall consist of nine members, including the chairperson or the deputy chairperson, the permanent members and the members designated by the chairperson each time for its meeting. In this case, the members designated by the chairperson shall include one or more members who have the qualifications prescribed in Article 107 (5) 2 of the Act and one or more members who have the qualification prescribed in subparagraph 5 of the same paragraph.
(4) A meeting of the Reexamination Committee shall take a decision with attendance of a majority of the members as prescribed in paragraph (3) and with approval of a majority of the members present. In this case, one or more members with the respective qualifications referred to in the latter part of paragraph (3) shall be present.
(5) Members other than the permanent members and the ex officio members, who attend a meeting of the Reexamination Committee, may be paid allowances and travel expenses within the limits of the budget.
(6) Except as provided in this Decree, matters necessary for the operation of the Reexamination Committee shall be determined by the chairperson after resolution at the Reexamination Committee.

Article 108 (Exclusion of, Challenge to, or Recusal of, Members)

(1) Any member of the Reexamination Committee shall be excluded from participating in the hearing and ruling of a case if he or she falls under any of the following subparagraphs:

1. Where a member or his or her spouse or former spouse is a party to the case, or a joint right holder or obligor regarding the case;

2. Where a member is or was a relative of a party to the case, who is prescribed in Article 777 of the Civil Act;

3. Where a member gives any testimony or makes an appraisal regarding the case;

4. Where a member is or was involved as an agent of a party to the case;

5. Where a member is involved in making a decision on insurance benefits, etc. which is the subject matter of the case.

(2) If any party finds it difficult to expect a fair hearing or ruling from a member, it may file an application to challenge such member.

(3) If any member falls under any ground as defined in paragraph (1) or (2), he or she may recuse himself or herself from the hearing and ruling of the case.

(4) Paragraphs (1) through (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis to employees, other than members, who are involved in clerical work concerning the hearing and ruling of a case.

Article 109 (Review and Ruling on Request for Reexamination)

(1) The provisions of Article 105 (1) and (3) through (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis with regard to review and decision on a request for reexamination. In this case, “Corporation” shall be read as “Reexamination Committee”, “request for examination through deliberation by the Examination Committee” as “request for reexamination”, “decision” as “ruling”, and “employee of the Corporation” as “member of the Reexamination Committee”, respectively.
(2) The ruling of the Reexamination Committee shall be binding on the Corporation.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 108 (Notification, etc. of Date and Place of Review on Request for Reexamination)

(1) The Reexamination Committee shall, upon receiving a request for reexamination, set the date and place of a review on the request, and notify in writing the party and the Corporation of this at least five days before the review.
(2) The notification as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be delivered directly or given by registered mail.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 109 (Opening of Review)

(1) A review by the Reexamination Committee shall be open to the public:Provided that it may not be open to the public at the request of the person requesting the reexamination.
(2) The request as referred to in the proviso of paragraph (1) shall be made using a document specifying the purpose and reason.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 110 (Protocol of Review)

(1) The Examination Committee shall prepare a protocol of review specifying the following matters as regards progress in a review of a request for reexamination:
1. Number and title of the case;
2. Date and place of the review;
3. Names of the members present;
4. Names of the parties present;
5. Details of the review;and
6. Other necessary matters
(2) The protocol of review as referred to in paragraph (1) shall contain the year, month and date of its preparation, and shall be signed or sealed by the chairperson.
(3) Any party or related person may make a request in writing to inspect the protocol as referred to in paragraph (1).
(4) If a party or related person makes a request for inspection pursuant to paragraph (3), the Reexamination Committee shall not refuse without justifiable reasons.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 111 (Organization and Operation of Subcommittee)

(1) If it is deemed necessary for making an efficient review on a request for reexamination, the Reexamination Committee may organize and operate a subcommittee composed of five members or less, including the following members:
1. through 3. deleted by Presidential Decree No. 29354, Dec, 11, 2018
(2) The subcommittee shall be composed of up to five members designated by the chairperson of the Reexamination Committee and from among Reexamination Committee members.
(3) The chairperson of the Reexamination Committee shall designate the chairperson of the Subcommittee from among the Subcommittee members.
(4) The subcommittee shall review the case of a request for reexamination which are designated by the chairperson, and make a report to the Committee.
(5) The provisions of the main text of Article 107 (1), and paragraphs (2), (4) and (5) of the same Article shall apply mutatis mutandis as regards the operation of the subcommittee. In this case, “chairperson” shall be read as "the chairperson of Subcommittee" and “Reexamination Committee” as “subcommittee”.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 112 (Assignment of Researchers)

(1) The Minister of Employment and Labor may assign five researchers or less to conduct professional research and surveys necessary for reexamination-related work by the Reexamination Committee, such as on industrial accident compensation insurance, industrial medicine, industrial nursing, management of harmful substances, radioactive rays, etc.
(2) Necessary matters concerning the qualifications, salaries, etc. of the researchers shall be prescribed by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Employment and Labor.

Article 110 (Succession to Status of Person Requesting Examination and Re-Examination)

In the event that a person requesting an examination or a reexamination is dead, if he/she is a person entitled to insurance benefits, the status shall be succeeded by the survivors as prescribed in Article 62 (1) or 81, and if not, by his/her heir or a person who has succeeded to the right or interest related to the insurance benefits subject to the request for examination or reexamination.

Article 111 (Relation with Other Acts)

(1) With respect to an interruption of prescription, a request for examination or reexamination made pursuant to Articles 103 and 106 shall be considered as a judicial request as prescribed in Article 168 of the Civil Act.
(2) In applying Article 18 of the Administrative Litigation Act, a ruling on a request for reexamination made pursuant to Article 106 shall be considered as a ruling on administrative appeals.
(3) Matters not provided for by this Act concerning a request for examination or reexamination under Articles 103 and 106 shall be governed by the provisions of the Administrative Appeals Act.

Enforcement Ordinance

Article 113 (Mutatis Mutandis Application)

The provisions of Articles 97, 98, 101, 103 and 104 shall apply mutatis mutandis as regards the correction and rejection of a request for reexamination, the suspension of execution of decisions, etc. on insurance benefits, the method of ruling, investigation for review, the payment of actual expenses, etc. In this case, “request for examination” shall be read as “request for reexamination”;“person making the request for examination” as “person making the request for reexamination” “Corporation” as “Reexamination Committee”;“affiliate organization of the Corporation” as “Corporation”;“decision on a request for examination” as “ruling on a request for reexamination”;and “written decision” as “written ruling” “person making the request for examination” in Article 103 (3) as “Corporation and the person making the request for reexamination”;and “request for examination or reexamination” in paragraph (4) of the same Article as “administrative lawsuit”, respectively.

For further questions, please
call (+82) 2-539-0098 or email bongsoo@k-labor.com

    • 맨앞으로
    • 앞으로
    • 다음
    • 맨뒤로